Arizona law allows autonomous vehicles and permits fully autonomous operation without a human driver if the operator submits required documentation (law-enforcement interaction plan and a written compliance statement) to ADOT; ADOT also publishes a list of companies that have submitted to test and/or operate in Arizona.

California requires AV permits through the California DMV (testing and deployment) and CPUC authority for passenger service/robotaxi operations where applicable. Both agencies maintain public permit/authorization registries.

Colorado law authorizes autonomous vehicle operation and does not create a broad statewide AV permit regime; however, the enacted legislation includes conditions for testing when an automated driving system is not capable of complying with all applicable traffic laws (requiring approvals from CDOT and Colorado State Patrol in those circumstances).

District law establishes an Autonomous Vehicle Testing Program that requires an autonomous vehicle testing permit before testing or operating autonomous vehicles on public roadways, and sets operational, insurance, and reporting requirements.

Florida statute broadly authorizes autonomous vehicle operation and does not establish a separate statewide AV permit roster in the cited law.

Georgia law authorizes autonomous vehicle operation without a separate statewide AV permit roster in the cited enacted bill.

Louisiana enacted AV operating authority and did not establish a statewide public AV permit roster in the cited bill materials.

Maryland publishes autonomous and connected vehicle testing guidance and oversight information via MVA; no comprehensive statewide public permit roster was identified in the cited source.

Massachusetts publishes autonomous vehicle policy guidance; no comprehensive statewide public permit roster was identified in the cited policy source.

Michigan statute authorizes autonomous vehicle operation and automated vehicle network activity without a separate public statewide permit roster in the cited law.

Minnesota does not have dedicated automated vehicle legislation for broad public-road AV testing/operations in the cited MnDOT guidance; MnDOT notes that AV operations must comply with existing statutes and traffic laws, with some activity (e.g., truck platooning) requiring coordination/approval.

Missouri law authorizes autonomous vehicle operation and does not define a separate statewide AV permit roster in the cited statute.

Nevada allows autonomous vehicles at all automation levels, but the DMV administers an Autonomous/EV testing and operations process that requires manufacturers/operators to apply for the Autonomous Vehicle Testing Registry and obtain compliance documentation/plates for testing and operation.

New York State requires an Autonomous Vehicle Technology Demonstration/Testing Permit through the NYS DMV framework; the DMV guidance describes requirements including a licensed driver behind the wheel and a $5M insurance policy. New York City also operates a separate AV testing permit program.

Pennsylvania publishes autonomous and connected vehicle policy and testing information, but the cited source does not provide a comprehensive statewide provider permit roster.

Tennessee law authorizes autonomous vehicle operation and does not establish a separate statewide AV permit roster in the cited statute text.

Texas enacted an automated motor vehicle permitting framework (SB 2807) and adopted implementing rules (TxDMV Chapter 220) with an effective date of Feb 27, 2026; the adopted rules indicate compliance is required after a 90-day period tied to the effective dates of rules adopted by TxDMV and the Public Safety Commission.

Washington operates an autonomous vehicle self-certification testing pilot program: entities must self-certify and provide required information to the Department of Licensing before testing Level 4/5 autonomous vehicles on public roadways; DOL provides public access to self-certification information and publishes annual summary reports.